Australian enforcement record current to 22 September 2026
Roby Casino and ACMA Blocking: What Happened in December 2025
Available in AUACMA included Roby Casino in a website-blocking action announced on 11 December 2025 after investigations found the listed services were operating in breach of the Interactive Gambling Act 2001. The blocking request was one part of a wider enforcement process that also named NovaForge Ltd in findings concerning prohibited and unlicensed interactive gambling services.
The chronology matters. ACMA’s public material records an investigation beginning in October 2025, a formal finding dated 4 November 2025, the December blocking action and later publication of the formal warning. That record is more precise than a simple statement that a site was “blocked”.
Table of Contents
- The short version
- The Roby Casino enforcement timeline
- What ACMA investigated in October 2025
- Why the Australian licence point appears in the warning
- What happened on 11 December 2025
- ACMA later documented the Roby-related enforcement record
- What the blocking action establishes
- What it does not establish
- Why a later domain can create confusion
- How the 2026 reform fits after the December 2025 action
- Primary sources for the Roby blocking record
- What the ACMA action changes for readers evaluating Roby Casino
The short version
On 11 December 2025, ACMA announced that it had requested Australian internet service providers to block Roby Casino and other services after investigations found the services to be operating in breach of the Interactive Gambling Act. The underlying ACMA enforcement material identifies NovaForge Ltd as the provider of the Roby Casino service investigated in 2025 and records an Australian customer-link and the absence of an Australian State or Territory licence.
Blocking is an enforcement and disruption measure. It does not by itself answer every question about a user’s account, a particular domain or the availability of every later website address. ACMA’s notice also makes clear that website blocking is only one of the regulator’s enforcement options.
The Roby Casino enforcement timeline
| Date | What the public record says | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| 7 October 2025 | ACMA commenced an investigation into Abu King, BetAlice, Great Win, Nova Jackpot, Power Up Casino, Roby Casino and Winbay. | This is the start date recorded in the later formal warning. |
| 4 November 2025 | The formal warning document is dated 4 November 2025. ACMA found that NovaForge Ltd provided prohibited and unlicensed regulated interactive gambling services to customers physically present in Australia. | The finding connects the Roby Casino service to a named provider and to specific provisions of the Interactive Gambling Act. |
| 11 December 2025 | ACMA announced a new blocking action and listed Roby Casino among the sites requested for blocking by Australian ISPs. | This is the public date associated with the Roby-specific blocking notice. |
| 2 February 2026 | The ACMA page hosting the formal warning was last updated. | The public record remained available as a regulator document after the 2025 investigation and blocking action. |
What ACMA investigated in October 2025
The formal warning says ACMA opened its investigation on 7 October 2025. The services under review included Roby Casino and six other named brands. The document says the services were available through specific URLs during the investigation and identifies NovaForge Ltd as the provider.
ACMA’s finding was not limited to the name of a website. The formal warning records that the services offered gambling services, including casino-style games of chance or mixed chance and skill played for money and services for placing, making, receiving or accepting bets. It also records that the services were provided over the internet and had an Australian customer-link.
What the finding says
- NovaForge Ltd was identified as the provider.
- The services had an Australian customer-link.
- ACMA found the services were prohibited and unlicensed for Australian customers.
- The finding was tied to the Interactive Gambling Act 2001.
Why the Australian licence point appears in the warning
The formal warning states that NovaForge Ltd was not licensed by an Australian State or Territory to provide regulated interactive gambling services to Australians. ACMA then concluded that NovaForge Ltd had contravened the relevant provisions by providing a prohibited and unlicensed regulated interactive gambling service to customers physically present in Australia.
This is important because “unlicensed” and “prohibited” are doing different work in the regulator’s wording. A service can raise a licensing issue because it lacks the required Australian authorisation, while a separate prohibition can apply to the type of online gambling service being offered. ACMA’s document describes the Roby-related services using both parts of that framework.
For readers comparing casino websites, the useful distinction is therefore between a site’s own commercial presentation and the Australian regulatory status of the service. The Is Roby Casino Legal in Australia? ACMA, Licensing and Player Context page covers that broader distinction and the current Australian register.
What happened on 11 December 2025
ACMA’s 11 December notice says it requested Australian ISPs to block more illegal online gambling sites after investigations found the services to be operating in breach of the Interactive Gambling Act. Roby Casino appears in the named list alongside other services.
ACMA described website blocking as one of a range of enforcement options intended to protect Australians from illegal online gambling. The same notice said that, by that point, 1,455 illegal gambling and affiliate websites had been blocked since the first blocking request in November 2019.
The December notice therefore sits inside a larger enforcement program. Roby’s appearance in the list is specific, but the blocking mechanism is not a special Roby-only procedure.
Blocking is not the same as a domain expiry
An ISP blocking action concerns access to a website or URL through Australian networks. It does not mean that the underlying domain has necessarily ceased to exist worldwide. Conversely, a domain that happens to load on one connection is not evidence that ACMA has withdrawn its enforcement position.
ACMA later documented the Roby-related enforcement record
ACMA’s October to December 2025 enforcement report records 23 investigations involving 45 gambling sites and 69 findings of breaches. Within the enforcement section, ACMA lists a formal warning to NovaForge Ltd covering Abu King, BetAlice, Great Win, Nova Jackpot, Power Up Casino, Roby Casino and Winbay. The report also lists robycasino3.com among the 133 websites referred for blocking.
The scale of the quarterly report provides useful context without changing the Roby-specific finding. ACMA recorded 38 findings involving prohibited interactive gambling services, 26 involving unlicensed regulated interactive gambling services and 5 involving advertising of prohibited and/or unlicensed regulated interactive gambling services. Roby is part of the named NovaForge enforcement group, rather than an isolated item with no provider context.
The regulator’s later report is also useful because it distinguishes investigations, formal warnings and website blocking. Those are related actions, but they are not interchangeable labels.
What the blocking action establishes
It establishes that ACMA had investigated the relevant services, found them in breach of the Interactive Gambling Act and referred Roby Casino for Australian website blocking in December 2025. It is direct regulator evidence of enforcement action concerning the Roby service.
It also explains why an Australian reader may encounter a domain that does not behave like an ordinary unrestricted website. Network-level disruption can affect access independently of the casino’s own account interface.
What it does not establish
It does not establish that every Roby-related domain will show the same result on every connection at every later date. It does not establish the status of a specific customer account, balance or withdrawal. And it does not turn a particular loading error into proof that a user’s credentials are wrong.
For account access questions, use Roby Casino Login separately from the regulatory record.
Why a later domain can create confusion
ACMA’s December 2025 notice and the quarterly enforcement report identify specific sites and URLs at the time of the blocking action. Online gambling services can also publish alternate domains, change their web addresses or appear through different network paths. A later URL should not be assumed to have a different regulatory status merely because its spelling or domain extension has changed.
The opposite mistake is also possible. If a page is inaccessible, the cause may be network blocking, a site outage, DNS behaviour, device settings or another technical issue. A reader should not use a single access result as a substitute for the regulator’s published enforcement record.
This is why the December chronology is more useful than a permanent statement that “Roby is blocked everywhere”. The regulator’s action is dated, the affected websites are documented and future blocking decisions can change as new domains appear or old ones disappear.
How the 2026 reform fits after the December 2025 action
Australia enacted the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Act 2026 on 26 August 2026. Most of the reform schedules commence on 1 January 2027. That future commencement does not erase the December 2025 Roby enforcement record, which was taken under the existing Interactive Gambling Act framework.
The 2026 reform also adds new disruption tools and other changes that matter to future enforcement. The separate Australian Online Casino Law Changes page explains the commencement dates so that future provisions are not confused with the rules that applied when ACMA acted against Roby in 2025.
Primary sources for the Roby blocking record
- ACMA – 11 December 2025 blocking notice
- ACMA – October to December 2025 enforcement report
- ACMA – Formal warning to NovaForge Ltd covering Roby Casino
- ACMA – About the Interactive Gambling Act
For the wider brand context, return to the Roby Casino Australia Review.
What the ACMA action changes for readers evaluating Roby Casino
The December 2025 action adds a direct Australian enforcement record to the Roby Casino picture. ACMA’s formal warning records an investigation that began on 7 October 2025 and a finding dated 4 November 2025 concerning NovaForge Ltd and the Roby Casino service. On 11 December 2025, ACMA announced that Roby Casino was among the services referred to Australian ISPs for blocking after breach findings. The later quarterly report places the same Roby service inside the regulator’s wider enforcement and disruption program. For readers, the key point is that website access and regulatory status are separate questions: a later domain may behave differently, but that does not remove the documented 2025 enforcement action. The next layer is the 2026 reform, whose main schedules begin on 1 January 2027 and should be assessed separately from the 2025 chronology.
Created by the ”Roby Casino” editorial team.
